The statistics used for the data analysis were percentage, mean, standard division, multiple correlation analysis and multiple regression analysis. The findings showed that: 1 the managerial accounting principles implementation in part of communication had positive relationships with and effects on performance effectiveness; and 2 the managerial accounting principles implementation in part of information had positive relationships with and effects on performance effectiveness.
Therefore, director of financial division should focus on managerial accounting principles implementation for success in managerial performance. New Submissions. Journal of Education, Loei Rajabhat University. Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology. Downloads Download data is not yet available. Strengthening of Pay and Pension Commission, Summary of Tax Expenditure Federal Budget Documents Pakistan Economic Survey Economic Stimulus Package.
Removal of difficulties for Pensioners receiving Pension in Pakistan but living abroad. Budget and Expenditure of Civil Works. Read More. Auditor General of Pakistan. Accountant General of Pakistan Revenue. Controller General of Accounts.
Supplement Stat. Important Updates Archieve. Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan.
For instance, it would be impossible to have thirty eight nuclear physics laboratories in Oxford, one for each College, so one is provided by the University and each College sends its students reading nuclear physics to that laboratory. The history of the finance of the University begins with manslaughter and murder. In the winter of an Oxford student killed a woman in a tavern brawl, and disappeared. The Mayor and townsmen of Oxford, intent on justice but failing to find the offender, arrested two or three innocent students who shared his lodging and, with the King's permission, hanged them outside the walls.
Thus began the first of the great conflicts between Town and Gown. The University, a training ground for clerics, was defended by the Church; the town's action was supported by King John, who was then engaged in a general and bitter struggle with the Pope, but the Church proved stronger than the King and, under threat of excommunication, the King eventually submitted to the Pope and, after a few years' defiance, the townsmen of Oxford also submitted.
In the Papal Legate in England issued an ordinance in which he imposed terms on the town, which included, as some recompense for hanging the students, annual payment of fifty-two shillings for the use of poor scholars and the payment for a feast for one hundred of them. This annual payment was the University's first endowment and it is an interesting example of the continuity of University history.
Shortly after the Abbot of Eynsham undertook the payment on behalf of the town and the Abbey continued to pay annually up to the dissolution of the monasteries in the sixteenth century. The Crown then took over the obligation and this blood money, as it might be called, was until recently paid to the Chest by the Paymaster General.
In , Robert Grosseteste, Bishop of Lincoln, directed that this revenue of the University should be paid into a chest to be kept in St. Frideswide's Priory and other gifts should be added thereto. This was the first University Chest. This was essentially a loan chest, a sort of academic pawnshop. Money was lent from it to finance needy students who deposited as security some pledge of value — a piece of plate, a garment or a book — which was to be sold at the end of the year if there were no repayment of the loan.
This chest at St. Frideswide's was followed by many others. Mary the Virgin on High Street, all of them being charitable foundations essentially for loans to needy students. The older statutes of the University show that many of these chests contained schedules of accounts, but although we have lists of the annually elected guardians of the chests, none of their accounts survive.
Early in the fifteenth century two new chests were made, both known as the Chest of the Five Keys. The first one, made in , was used chiefly to hold University statutes and other documents of value. The second, made in was reserved for money and plate. The five keys of this chest were held by the Vice-Chancellor and four elected Masters of Arts, and there were also eight Auditors of the accounts of the chest.
The Chest of the Five Keys is the direct ancestor of the Chest as we know it today, the central financial organisation of the University. This fifteenth century chest, normally on exhibition in the Ashmolean Museum, was in use until when it was superseded by a painted iron chest which was in use up to The Chest then disappeared for over a century as it was no longer needed; the University having in opened a banking account with Messrs.
The Chest was found in Corpus Christi College in and when opened on the 28th January of that year in the bailiff's room at Corpus Christi in the presence of the President and Bursar of Corpus Christi College and the Secretary of the Chest was found to contain:. It was removed to the Old Clarendon Building, then the site of the University's administrative offices, and in the seventies to the University Offices at Wellington Square to the office of the Director and Secretary of the Chest.
When the documentary contents of the chest were catalogued, and removed to the archives in , the canvas bag with its coins was found, and retained as a symbol of the continuity of financial responsibility in the office of the Chest and, one might say, the University's last reserve.
No accounts of the Chest earlier than the sixteenth century have survived. There are, however, two other sets of accounts surviving from the Middle Ages, the earlier of which is a small account book of expenses incurred by University officials in travelling to London on legal business over a period of three months in This is the earliest financial document in the University archives.
The other earlier accounts are more interesting since they consist of a series of fifteen audited account rolls dating from to These are the annual accounts of the Proctors, two Masters of Arts annually elected as the official representatives of the University and responsible for its routine administration. All these fifteenth-century rolls are audited accounts set out in a simple charge and discharge form, the balance at the end being given in running prose.
This is a rough translation of the Latin in the first surviving roll:. The income came chiefly from fees paid by those taking degrees, from rents of a few houses which the University owned in Oxford and from customary receipts like the payment of 52 shillings a year for the hanging of the students. The payments made by the proctors were mainly for university lectures, university ceremonies, the repair of buildings and so on, but two small items may be of particular interest.
Every year, the Proctors, who were the chief disciplinary officers of the University, made a claim to cover the expenses of some of their statutory duties, which included the patrolling of the streets at night and the hiring or maintenance of arms for the enforcement of their discipline. Payments under these two heads, the night watch and the upkeep of arms, were always made to the Proctors in round figures, with the note "ut placet iudicibus", - as the auditors please.
This definitely suggests that the Proctors were paid a sort of concealed salary, concealed in these suspiciously round figures for incidental expenses, and that the amounts of such payments were fixed by the auditors when the balance for the year was known. This method of paying salaries out of the annual balance must certainly have encouraged economy in University administration. One other interesting feature of these early accounts is that one of the largest items of expenditure in any one year was often the cost of a feast given to the auditors.
For the early sixteenth century no accounts survive, but there is ample evidence that accounts, and an accountant, were badly needed. As explained above, the University's assets were kept in a number of chests, the principal of which was the Chest of the Five Keys; others, a dozen or more, were still used for making loans to needy students, and contained a great variety of valuable pledges.
But the general administration of these chests had not been audited for thirty years and the University Chancellor, Archbishop Warham, sent down his own representative to conduct a thorough inquiry. In a letter to the University the Chancellor blamed the Proctors, who, he said, in financial matters "opened their mouths to their own advantage". When the proctors came to submit their annual account, it was said they got their own friends elected as auditors, and where they should have made a profit for the University they actually left it poorer by including "vain and superfluous charges"; in modern terms, they fiddled their expense account — ut placet iudicibus.
So far as the chests were concerned, the Chancellor's inquiry in showed that something like a third of the assets had mysteriously disappeared. But worse was to follow, for in the University discovered that the all-important Chest of the Five Keys had been robbed and a great part of its contents had gone.
On December 17th the University Convocation ordered that what remained should be put back into the Chest of the Five Keys, and this was to be repaired and deposited in the house of the treasurer of University College. A month later Convocation turned its attention to the other chests, and ordered that all the pledges should be sold. Thereafter the Chest of the Five Keys survived alone. Any loans which might be made were made from this chest, but its primary use was a sort of trust pool for University administration.
Up to the mid-sixteenth century the only series of annual accounts was that of the Proctors. The Vice-Chancellor, administrative head of the University, does not appear to have kept any accounts for the simple reason that he does not appear to have had any regular source of income to administer.
This is exemplified in the earliest Vice-Chancellor's account roll covering the three years This account is probably the direct outcome of the perturbation following the despoiling of the Chest in This document is a sheet of parchment in simple charge and discharge form.
The sums involved are very small. The reason for there not being any early Vice-Chancellor's accounts is simple - the Vice-Chancellor had nothing to account for. But a change soon came, and from a somewhat unexpected quarter. The medieval University was essentially an ecclesiastical institution, designed to educate clerics. The Reformation, consequently, had a shattering effect on the University, for all, reformers or counter-reformers, were equally disturbed by the general air of insecurity.
Many left the University with their studies incomplete; many of the academic exercises fell into disuse; the buildings in which those exercises were held were allowed to decay. This state of affairs was rectified by Queen Mary Tudor, who has not generally been recognised as one of the great benefactors of the University. This income was to be used to repair the Divinity School, to rebuild the old Schools of Arts and to revive many of the academic and religious practices which the Reformation had swept away.
In the year in which Queen Mary made her benefaction to the University the counter-Reformation really got under way. Cranmer, Latimer and Ridley were brought from the Tower of London to defend their Protestant heresies. They were brought to the Divinity School, where brambles and nettles then grew against the walls, and they were forced to dispute for their faith with learned doctors of the University.
Their opinions were condemned, and within two years all three were burnt at the stake in Broad Street. This is the setting of Queen Mary's benefaction. One of the earliest charges on the benefaction was the payment for writing out the examination of Archbishop Cranmer, but the bulk of the income in the early years was devoted to repairs and rebuilding.
It is interesting to note, incidentally, that all the financial responsibility for the rebuilding of the schools was entrusted by the University to the first President of St. John's College, who was later dismissed from his post as President by the founder of that College for misappropriation of college funds. It is a lesson which the University never tired of learning.
But Queen Mary's benefaction, born of the counter-reformation, inaugurated a renaissance in University finance and accounting. Now the University's revenue was tripled, and moreover, the control of the greater part of this income was given to the Vice-Chancellor. A new series of accounts is now available, far exceeding the Proctors' accounts in variety and interest. The present day University accounts have evolved from this early form of Vice-Chancellor's account roll which itself is a direct outcome of Queen Mary Tudor's attempt to re-establish Roman Catholicism in the University.
In the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, the procedure of accounting seems to have been for the Vice-Chancellor at the end of each year of his office to present his accounts to auditors, who were senior members of the University nominated annually for this purpose. The documents produced at this stage were presumably just loose memoranda and receipted bills.
When the auditors agreed the accounts, two copies were written on separate sheets of parchment by the University Registrar, one copy for the Vice-Chancellor and one copy for preservation in the University Chest. From about a third copy of these accounts was entered in book form, but the explanation of this requires another brief digression into University history. Queen Mary's benefaction failed in its immediate purposes, and within fifty years the old Schools of Arts had again become ruins and had to be rebuilt on a different plan in the early seventeenth century.
Again the University attracted a great benefactor, Sir Thomas Bodley, who in the year offered to refound the University Library. Sir Thomas had discussed with Sir John Bennet, MP for the University, a project for building new schools and adjoining his library, and Bennet had undertaken to raise money for this purpose from well-wishers to the University.
At his death, Bodley bequeathed his considerable estate to the University and willed that part of it should be devoted to building a third storey on the Schools quadrangle which the University had begun to build in , the year of Bodley's death.
Throughout this period no detailed accounts appear to have been kept of University expenditure on the building, and there are only two partial accounts made about by the executors of Sir Thomas Bodley's will. Sir John Bennet, it is interesting to note, not only raised money directly for the University's share of the building, but he was also one of Bodley's executors, and in he was prosecuted in Parliament for gross bribery in his office as Judge of the Prerogative Court of Canterbury.
The scandal which followed on this revelation of Bennet's defalcations had one notable result. In the University decreed that the Vice-Chancellor should render an annual account of income and expenditure on the Schools account together with his own general account.
The first effect of this was the compilation of an account of expenditure on the schools for the three years , written on a parchment roll ten and a half feet long. Undeterred by this lengthy piece of accounting, the Registrar then copied out the whole account again into a paper book, and thereafter all future accounts, both Vice-Chancellor's and Proctors', were copied into a series of account books which were maintained without any major change until the late nineteenth century.
Image: Vice-Chancellor's Accounts All this was one result of the Sir John Bennet scandal, an affair which had lengthy reverberations. In the Bodleian Library accounts the claim against Bennet was carried on the books for a hundred and fifty years, down to Having made his account book for the current accounts, the Registrar, in , received from the Chest all the earlier extant account rolls, and copied all these, with the exception of the fifteenth-century Proctors' rolls into the new account books, so that these books now contain a more or less complete series of accounts from the mid-sixteenth century.
These books did not, however, supersede the use of parchment sheets which were still used, and kept in roll form down to for the Vice-Chancellor's account and down to for the Proctors' account. Delegates were appointed to consider what steps could be taken to wipe out these debts, and having adopted various financial expedients, they came to the momentous decision that the:.
College statutes show that from the earliest times members of the University clearly understood the value of some recognised procedure for accounting and auditing. The earlier statutes of Merton College, confirmed in , contain elaborate regulations for auditing the accounts of the warden, the bursars and the bailiffs of college properties. The statutes of New College show how early the colleges began to recruit trained bursary clerks, for the statutes of provide for the appointment of a chapel clerk who should be taught grammar and writing, unless already well grounded in these subjects, and who should be employed on writing out accounts, copying muniments and generally assisting the bursar and treasurer.
But perhaps the most clear-sighted college administrators were those men of Balliol who in their revised statutes of stipulated the number of treasurers and bursars required for college business and decreed that they should not be sluggish, but should be kept awake by labour. As the Oxford colleges founded in the Middle Ages were all landowning bodies, members of the college were familiar with the accepted forms of manorial accounting; they were prepared to apply those to the accounts of the University as a whole, and they could call on the services of clerks trained in manorial accounting.
The University accounts which survive from the late Middle Ages show the result of this conjuncture. Financial services — refer to services provided by the finance industry. The finance industry encompasses a broad range of organizations that deal with the management of money. Among these organizations are credit unions, banks, credit card companies, insurance… … Wikipedia.
MembershipThe division consists of colleges and universities that choose not to offer athletically related financial aid athletic scholarships to… … Wikipedia. Financial capital — is money used by entrepreneurs and businesses to buy what they need to make their products or provide their services.
Financial capital vs. Financial accountancy — or financial accounting is the field of accountancy concerned with the preparation of financial statements for decision makers, such as stockholders, suppliers, banks, employees, government agencies, owners, and other stakeholders.
The… … Wikipedia. Division — Division of function.